logo_sm.gif (4042 bytes)
Your Source for Up-To-Date News and Research on the Collision Repair Industry 

Subscribe to INSIGHT Editor's Desk News Alerts
click here to subscribe to the FREE INSIGHT Editor's Desk News Alert Email

lftspace.GIF (57 bytes)
Today's News
INSIGHT This Month
INSIGHT Archives
Survey Center
Letter to the Editor
Business Tools
Subscription Information
CSI Reporting
Financial Analysis
IRS Audit Guide
Technical Info

Market Watch Rates
INSIGHT Inside this month's issue...
Letter to the Editor
cntspace.GIF (53 bytes)
Thursday July 19

AASP MA/RI and Industry Groups Testify in Support of Right to Repair at Hearing

Various consumers and industry groups had their opinions heard on June 26, 2007 at the first hearing of H.B. 296, the Massachusetts Motor Vehicle Owners’ Right to Repair Act. Members of the Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Licensure heard numerous witnesses who testified in support of the legislation, including AASP MA/RI Immediate Past President Stan Morin of New England Tire and Vice President Bill Cahill of BC Auto.

"House Bill 296 addresses a growing concern among Massachusetts state legislators who have heard constituents' complaints about the inability of the independent repair industry to fully and completely repair their vehicles due to computer repair information lock-outs by the car companies,” explained Morin. “They don't have a choice in auto repair shops because they're told to return to the car dealerships. Consumers want to spend their income the way they choose. I want to have the freedom of choice on where and how to spend my disposable income.”

Testifying witnesses in support of legislation explained that in spite of investing in diagnostic tools, searching car company websites, and exhausting all other resources, they were still unable to gain access to all the information that is needed to repair vehicles.

However, not all the testimony was in favor of Right to Repair legislation. The Association of International Automobile Manufacturers (AIAM) testified that HB 296 is a security risk. An AIAM post-hearing press release stated: "Vehicle security information is carefully controlled to make sure it stays out of the hands of potential thieves, but under HB 296 any individual who owns a car or any auto repair shop technician would have access to this sensitive information."

Other opponents of HB 296 stated that not only were information access issues intermittent, but that with help of the National Automotive Service Task Force (NASTF), even these infrequent instances could be resolved.

ASA Mechanical President and chairman of ASA-Colorado, Donny Seyfer, co-owner of Seyfer Automotive in Wheatridge, Colorado, further testified that such occurrences were isolated and could be addressed with use of the proper tools.

“It amazes me that opponents of HB 296 [OEMs and ASA] hide behind NASTF and they claim there are only isolated incidents,” concluded Cahill. “Well, if we are all having problems, then they are not isolated.”

©2007 Collision Repair Industry INSIGHT
All Rights Reserved



Sherwin-Williams Automotive Finishes

DuPont Automotive Refinish

Spies-Hecker Automotive Refinish

Akzo Nobel

National Auto Body Council
INSIGHT Supports the NABC!
Do You?