logo_sm.gif (4042 bytes)
Your Source for Up-To-Date News and Research on the Collision Repair Industry 

 
Subscribe to INSIGHT Editor's Desk News Alerts
click here to subscribe to the FREE INSIGHT Editor's Desk News Alert Email

lftspace.GIF (57 bytes)
SUBSCRIBERS-ONLY
Today's News
INSIGHT This Month
INSIGHT Archives
Survey Center
Letter to the Editor
Business Tools
Subscription Information
CSI Reporting
Financial Analysis
IRS Audit Guide
Management/
Technical Info

1998 Market Watch Rates
INSIGHT Inside this month's issue...
Feedback
Letter to the Editor
cntspace.GIF (53 bytes)
This article originally appeared in the August, 1999 Issue of INSIGHT

August 1999 Editor's Page
There's No Free Lunch - Revisited

This month we receive public confirmation that competition is driving refinish paint manufacturers and their jobbers to take whatever means necessary to expand and/or protect their marketshare.

It started with a free computer system, or the subsidized spray booth, to secure a repairer's business. Today, this has progressed to the level of multi-million dollar payments and loan guarantees directly from the manufacturers.

On the first page, we detail the early July announcement by BASF that, through their wholly-owned jobber group Automotive Refinish Technologies (ART), they will invest up to $17 million in the Canada-based Boyd Group repair chain. Investment, though, is not exactly the whole story.

BASF will take no equity or debt holder position with the Boyd Group. Instead, BASF receives all of Boyd's paint and materials business during the six-year term of the agreement. For Boyd to receive the full $17 million, they must meet certain performance and growth goals. Basically, the $17 million is tied to expansion.

The question for many repairers is now, "Where's mine?"

BASF customers will be posing that question the next time their jobber or manufacturer's rep walks through the door. Customers of competing brands will also attempt to leverage BASF's largesse to secure better deals for themselves.

Don't take this statement the wrong way. INSIGHT has not retreated from our position that there is no Free Lunch. Repairers will pay for the freebies they receive in the form of higher paint prices and reduced service. For many repairers, a better return might come from a supported, productive product at a fair price.

Occasional bouts of technological change, such as the switch to urethane and higher solids materials in the early 1990s, presented momentary opportunities for suppliers to differentiate their products. Today, rightly or wrongly, most shops view paint brands as interchangeable.

Paint companies, for their part, have fought this commoditization through the introduction of value-added programs, formula retrieval computer systems, and color matching tools they hope will set them apart in a crowded field.

However, without a clear value advantage, the level of competition among suppliers and the payouts to eager repairers will continue. o

rtsig2.gif (2676 bytes)




Russell Thrall III
Editor

 

Feedback

Have a comment about this article? Send Email to Russell Thrall, INSIGHT's Editor

©1999 Collision Repair Industry INSIGHT
All Rights Reserved

FEATURED
LINKS:

Get Free Email News Alerts

PPG Automotive Refinish

DuPont Automotive Refinish

Sherwin-Williams Automotive Finishes

Spies-Hecker Automotive Refinish

National Auto Body Council
INSIGHT Supports the NABC!
Do You?